Skip to main content

Steam Traps selection and advantages vs. disadvantages of each type

There are many factors that affect steam generating system in the energy industry, and multiple pros and cons in selecting a right steam trap for your application, the following are advantages vs. disadvantages of each type of steam trap to consider when selecting one for your project.



AdvantagesDisadvantages
Disc Steam Traps

• Failure mode. gradually, predictably open over time.

• Simple construction.

• Small size and light weight.

• Can be mounted in any position.

• Rugged. withstands water hammer.

• Self draining, not damaged by freezing.

• Function not impaired by superheat.

• Versatile, suitable for wide pressure range.

• Condensate discharge temperature closely follows the saturation curve.

• Performance is easily checked in field.

• Marginal air handling capability.

• Excessive backpressure in return systems can prevent trap from closing.

• Life is reduced significantly as pressures move above 300 psi.

• High discharge noise level.

• Dirt particles can increase cycle rate causing wear.

Piston Steam Traps

• Suitable for high pressure

• Can be mounted in any position.

• Good response to changing condensate load conditions.

• Rugged, withstands water hammer.

• Self-draining, not damaged by freezing.

• Function not impaired by superheat.

• Good air handling capability.

• Primary failure mode-open.

• Small size and light weight.

• Excessive backpressure in return systems can prevent trap from closing.

• Condensate discharge temperature follows the saturation curve over a limited range.

• Difficult to field check because of continuous control flow discharge.

Lever Steam Traps

• Suitable for high pressure applications.

• Good response to changing condensate load conditions.

• Rugged, withstands water hammer. 

• Not damaged by freezing.

• Function not impaired by superheat. 

• Good air handling capability.

• Small, compact, easy to install and service.

• Excessive back pressure in return systems can prevent trap from closing.

• Difficult to field check due to continuous control flow discharge.

• Can only be mounted in one position.

Closed Float Steam Traps

• Unaffected by sudden or wide pressure changes.

• Responds very quickly to condensate load changes.

• Continuous discharge.

• Condensate discharge temperature closely follows the saturation curve.

• Function is not impaired by high back pressures.

• Energy efficient.

• Simple construction.

• Relatively large and heavy.

• Float easily damaged by water hammer.

• Does not withstand freezing.

• Can be mounted only in one position.

• Suitable only for relatively low pressures.

• Requires auxiliary air vent which is an additional source of failure.

• Primary failure mode is closed.

• Not self draining.

Inverted Bucket Steam Traps

• Simple construction.

• Rugged.

• Condensate discharge temperature closely follows the saturation curve.

• Reliable.

• Marginal air handling during start-up.

• Not self draining; subject to freeze ups.

• Not suitable when superheat is present.

• Can lose prime. and is not self-priming.

• Can be mounted only in a single position.

• Failure mode is unpredictable (open or closed).

Open Bucket Steam Traps

• Simple construction.

• Reliable.

• Condensate discharge temperature closely follows the saturation curve.

• Function not impaired by high back pressure.

• Fast response to changing condensate loads.

• Not self draining; subject to freeze ups.

• Not suitable when superheat is present.

• Can lose prime, not self-priming.

• Can be mounted only in a single position.

• Requires auxiliary air vent which is an additional source of failure.

• Suitable only for relatively low pressures.

• Relatively large and heavy.

Bimetallic Steam Trap

• Rugged.

• Energy efficient.

• Self draining.

• Resistant to freeze damage.

• Withstands water hammer.

• Capable of discharge temperature adjustment.

• Can be mounted in several positions.

• Primary failure mode-open.

• Dirt particles can prevent tight valve closing.

• Condensate discharge temperatures do not follow the saturation curve closely.

• Difficult to field check when operating in a throttling mode.

• Condensate discharge temperature is made lower as backpressure increases.

• Relatively slow response to changing condensate loads.

• Bimetallic elements are relatively susceptible to corrosion.

Bellows Steam Traps

• Excellent air handling capability.

• Energy efficient.

• Self draining.

• Various condensate discharge temperatures available depending on bellows design.

• Condensate discharge temperature follows the saturation curve.

• Can be mounted in several positions.

• Simple construction.

• Small size and weight.

• Bellows elements tend to be failure prone, especially when subjected to water hammer.

• Difficult to field check when operating in a throttling mode.

• Generally not suited for high pressure applications.

• Limited superheat capability.

• Short stroke diaphragm design susceptible to dirt initiated failures.

Liquid or Solid Expansion Steam Traps (Wax Capsule Steam Trap)

• Rugged.

• Good air handling capability.

• Resistant to freeze damage.

• Withstands water hammer.

• Can be mounted in any position.

• Self draining.

• Primary failure mode is open.

• Dirt particles can prevent tight close.

• Requires substantial sub-cooling.

• Difficult to field check.

• Slow response to changing condensate loads.

• Actuator damaged by exposure to high temperature.

Orifice Steam Traps

• No moving parts.

• Suitable for high pressure application.

• Rugged, withstands water hammer.

• Not damaged by freezing.

• Function not impaired by superheat.

• Can be mounted in any position.

• Orifice size must be carefully selected for each installation.

• Can not respond to varying condensate loads.

• Inefficient if oversized.

• Dirt particles readily impair performance.

• Difficult to field check because of continuous discharge.

• In the absence of condensate, the trap passes live steam.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Green Urea: A Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Fertilizer for Agriculture

Fertilizers are an essential component of modern agriculture, providing the nutrients necessary for plants to grow and produce high yields. However, the production of traditional fertilizers is often associated with significant environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions and pollution of waterways and soil. Green urea is a new type of fertilizer that offers a more sustainable and eco-friendly alternative to traditional urea. What is Green Urea? Green urea is a type of fertilizer that is produced using renewable energy sources and sustainable production methods. Unlike traditional urea, which is primarily made from non-renewable fossil fuels, green urea is made using carbon dioxide captured from industrial emissions or directly from the atmosphere, and hydrogen generated from renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, or hydropower. The production process of green urea involves the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to form carbon monoxide and hydrogen, followe...

Difference between the AEM and PEM electrolyzers

AEM (Anion Exchange Membrane) and PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) electrolyzers are both types of electrolysis devices that use electricity to split water into its constituent parts, hydrogen and oxygen. However, there are some key differences between these two types of electrolyzers. Technical Difference The main technical difference between AEM (Anion Exchange Membrane) and PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) electrolyzers lies in the type of membrane used and the resulting electrochemical reactions that occur. Membrane Material: AEM electrolyzers use an anion exchange membrane that selectively allows negatively charged ions (such as hydroxide ions) to pass through, while blocking positively charged ions (such as hydrogen ions). In contrast, PEM electrolyzers use a proton exchange membrane that selectively allows only positively charged ions (protons) to pass through. Electrolyte: AEM electrolyzers use an alkaline electrolyte (such as potassium hydroxide), while PEM electrolyzers use an a...

Haber-Bosch Process: List of Catalysts

The Haber-Bosch process is an important industrial process for the production of ammonia, which is used as a fertilizer and a key raw material for the production of various chemicals. The process involves the reaction of nitrogen gas and hydrogen gas in the presence of a catalyst to produce ammonia. Over the years, several catalysts have been developed for the Haber-Bosch process . In this article, we will discuss some of the most widely used catalysts for this process. Iron-Based Catalysts: Iron-based catalysts were the first catalysts used in the Haber-Bosch process and remain the most widely used today. These catalysts are typically composed of iron oxide (Fe 2 O 3 ) or iron carbide (Fe 3 C) supported on a high surface area material such as alumina. These catalysts typically operates at temperatures between 400°C and 550°C and pressures ranging from 150-300 bar. The feed gas, which consists of nitrogen and hydrogen, is introduced to the catalyst bed at a ratio of 1:3.  Iron-bas...